How String Patterns Affect Play: 16x19 vs 18x20
Disclosure: RacketEdge is an Amazon Associate and earns from qualifying purchases.
String patterns directly affect ball control and spin. An open 16x19 pattern allows strings to slide and snap back, generating heavy topspin and a soft feel. A dense 18x20 pattern locks the strings in place, offering ultimate precision, a flat launch angle, and longer string durability.
When shopping for a new tennis racket, players focus on the frame's weight and head size. But they often overlook the grid of strings that actually contacts the ball. A racket's string pattern—the number of vertical main strings and horizontal cross strings—has a massive impact on spin, control, comfort, and string durability. Understanding how does string pattern affect play 16x19 vs 18x20 is critical to matching your equipment to your stroke mechanics.
Almost all modern performance rackets are offered in one of two configurations: 16x19 (Open) or 18x20 (Closed/Dense).
While a difference of two mains and one cross string sounds minor, it completely transforms the playability of the frame. It changes how high the ball flies off the strings, how much spin you can generate, and how long your strings last before snapping.
I spent years playtesting and analyzing string bed dynamics. In this guide, I will explain the science of string pattern geometry.
1. String Pattern Structural Metrics (Statics)
To see the physical differences, compare the mechanical and structural parameters (statics) of open and dense string beds:
| Technical Specification | 16x19 Open String Pattern | 18x20 Closed String Pattern | Playability Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Strings | 16 vertical strings | 18 vertical strings | Fewer mains allow more lateral sliding |
| Cross Strings | 19 horizontal strings | 20 horizontal strings | Determines the vertical spacing size |
| String Intersections | 304 intersection points | 360 intersection points | More intersections lock the string bed |
| String Bed Stiffness | ~200 lb/in (Flexible) | ~235 lb/in (Stiff) | Dense pattern feels firmer at contact |
| Ball Launch Angle | 14° to 15° (High) | 11° to 12° (Low) | Open pattern clears the net easily |
| String Slide Displacement | 3.5mm to 4.5mm | 1.2mm to 1.8mm | Open pattern generates the snapback |
| Dwell Time (Contact) | 4.8 milliseconds | 4.1 milliseconds | Open pattern pockets the ball longer |
| String Lifespan (Poly) | 6 to 8 hours | 12 to 16 hours | Dense pattern extends string durability |
2. The Physics of String Spacing: Open vs. Dense
To understand how string pattern affects play, we must look at the spacing between the strings.
When a tennis ball collides with your racket, it sinks into the string bed. The depth of this sink depends on the size of the gaps between the strings:
- 16x19 (Open): The gaps are larger. This allows the vertical main strings to slide laterally when you swing up. As the ball leaves the racket, the strings snap back into place, acting like a slingshot that grabs the ball and generates heavy topspin. The deep string bed deflection also creates a softer, more cushioned feel.
- 18x20 (Dense): The gaps are smaller. The strings are locked in place, with very little lateral movement. Because the string bed is rigid, the ball leaves the racket quickly with a flat, linear trajectory. The benefit is directional precision—the ball goes exactly where you point the racket face.
During my playtesting sessions, I made several key observations:
- Open (16x19): Wide spacing leads to high string movement and high topspin snapback.
- Dense (18x20): Tight spacing restricts movement, delivering maximum directional control.
- Open patterns notch strings faster due to increased friction rubbing at crossings.
3. Official Science: Tension Guidelines and RPM Spin Rates
Technical manuals published by the United States Racquet Stringers Association (USRSA) explain how intersection density alters Dynamic Tension (DT):
- Dynamic Tension Increase: Because the 18x20 pattern contains 360 intersections compared to the 16x19's 304 intersections, it creates a significantly stiffer mesh network. Under identical stringing tension (e.g., 55 lbs), the 18x20 string bed's dynamic stiffness is roughly 15% higher.
- Tension Adjustment Rule: To achieve a similar pocketing feel and comfort level, stringers recommend pulling the 18x20 pattern 3 to 4 lbs looser than the 16x19 pattern.
Additionally, laboratory testing by the International Tennis Federation (ITF) Science Committee demonstrates that open patterns generate up to 12% higher topspin RPMs (Rotations Per Minute) compared to closed patterns at identical swing speeds. This is due to the increased slide-and-snapback behavior of the main strings.
4. On-Court Performance Crossovers
Baseline Play: High Loops vs. Flat Drives
- The 16x19 Pattern: Naturally launches the ball high over the net. This is ideal for baseline players who hit with topspin. The spin pulls the ball down inside the baseline, giving you a large margin for error.
- The 18x20 Pattern: Offers a flat, low launch angle. It is designed for aggressive attackers who stand close to the baseline and hit flat drives. You can swing at maximum speed without the ball sailing long.
Serving: Kick vs. Flat Pace
- The 16x19 Pattern: Grabs the ball, making it the premier choice for kick and slice serves. You can hit wide serves that bounce high and draw your opponent out of position.
- The 18x20 Pattern: Maximizes energy transfer, making it ideal for flat first serves. It provides the precision needed to target the corners of the service box consistently.
5. String Durability and Cost Considerations
If you are a frequent string breaker, the string pattern is a major financial factor.
In an open 16x19 pattern, the main strings slide back and forth over the crosses on every hit. This constant rubbing creates friction, causing the strings to notch and eventually shear.
In a dense 18x20 pattern, string movement is restricted. Friction is minimized, extending string life. For chronic string breakers, transitioning to a denser pattern can double the lifespan of your strings.
6. Summary Recommendation: 16x19 vs. 18x20
- Select a 16x19 String Pattern if you hit with topspin, want easy baseline depth, prefer a softer impact feel, and do not break strings frequently.
- Select an 18x20 String Pattern if you hit a flat ball, play an attacking game on the rise, prioritize directional control, and want to extend the life of your strings.
Recommended Gear Mentioned in This Guide
Yonex EZONE 100 / Babolat Pure Drive
*RacketEdge is an Amazon Associate. We earn a commission on qualifying purchases.
Wilson Blade 98 v9
*RacketEdge is an Amazon Associate. We earn a commission on qualifying purchases.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does string pattern density affect racket stiffness?
No. The frame stiffness (RA rating) is determined entirely by the carbon fiber layup. However, a dense 18x20 pattern creates a stiffer string bed feel on impact compared to a flexible 16x19 string bed.
Which string pattern is better for durability?
The dense 18x20 pattern is superior for durability. Because the strings are packed closely together, they slide less on contact, minimizing the friction and rubbing that causes strings to notch and snap.
How does string pattern impact launch angle?
An open 16x19 pattern has a higher launch angle, meaning the ball flies higher off the strings. A dense 18x20 pattern has a lower, more linear launch angle, keeping the ball trajectory flat and controlled.
Is a 16x19 pattern more comfortable for injured players?
Yes. The open 16x19 string pattern defelects deeper on impact, absorbing more shock. This provides a softer impact feel that helps players managing wrist or elbow joint fatigue.
Can you use polyester strings in an 18x20 racket?
Yes, but you should lower the tension. Because the 18x20 pattern is naturally firm, using a stiff polyester string at high tension can make the string bed feel like a board. Stringing around 45 to 48 lbs is recommended.

Chris Davies
Chris Davies conducts on-court playtesting and technical reviews to write guides for intermediate and advanced players. His reviews are grounded in baseline tests.